Some of the rings are old.

He did a lousy job of throwing everyone off his trail!!!

See here:

https://ancientartifakes.net/smf/index.php/topic,1511.0.html


The seller here, Mr Mir,  obviously didn't like us here telling the truth about his fakes.
He thought he could deal with the situation by changing his ID on eBay !

NOTE:
Has changed ID to arts-ancient

https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_ssn=arts-ancient&store_name=ancientromanagallery&_oac=1&_trksid=p2047675.m3561.l2562

I have heard from a collector who has bought something from this man. It is very definitely a fairly well made fake. He is proposing to return it for a full refund but is also going to take action to get this seller looked into by the approprtiate authorities.
Pat

Probably gave away free phony stuff for writing such rubbish

More comments on his feedback (from duped gullible buyers)
Jerry

Hi,

I think the Roman coin is a denarius of Domitian actually.
Might be genuine but is of low value in that condition.

The other coin ring with the Thrace/Thasos stater is surely not a genuine coin.
It would be crazy to put a genuine example into such a ring.

Jerry.

The setting (band) is certainly not Roman, and is dateable to the post-medieval/early modern period. Into this setting was inserted a Roman coin which looks like Vespasian, but don't quote me. No idea if the coin is genuine. Don't know why anyone would take the time to fabricate such a low-value item, but anything is possible.

Does this clarify?

Gaius

Thanks everyone! Not sure about the comment on the coin ring. Are you saying if it's not a real coin, it's from the 17th - 19th century? And if it is a real coin, then it is from an earlier time? How do you know the coin and ring are from different periods?
Thanks again everyone.